Rats

Well, The Span of Empire didn't win the Dragon Award for Best Military SF and Fantasy Novel this year.  However, it was an honor to be nominated, and I want to thank those of you who supported Eric and I in both the nominations phase and the voting.

Better luck next time, I guess.  :-)

D

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged as: , | Leave a comment

Dragon Awards Final Reminder

Midnight tonight is the close of the Dragon Award voting time period. You still have time to register and vote if you haven't.

Keep in mind that The Span of Empire, a novel I co-authored with Eric Flint, was nominated for Best Military SF Novel, and Eric's solo novel 1636: The Ottoman Onslaught was nominated for Best Alternate History Novel.

D

Posted in General, Publishing | Tagged as: , , | Leave a comment

Voting Reminder

Copied from the DragonCon website:

Vote now for the 2017 Dragon Awards!

Posted on August 4, 2017 by admin

The nomination period for the 2017 Dragon Awards has ended; so what do you do now? Make sure you are registered to vote, check out the 2017 ballot, and vote for your favorites!

Note – you have until Sunday, August 28th at 11:59 pm, EDT, to register. Voting ends on Tuesday, August 29, 2017, at 11:59 pm, EDT.

 

The voting deadline is next Tuesday. As noted, my book "The Span of Empire" is up for Best Military SF novel, and my co-author Eric Flint's solo novel "1636: The Ottoman Onslaught" is up for Best Alternate History novel.

If you haven't already voted, please do so. You still have time to register at http://awards.dragoncon.org/…/vote-now-for-the-2017-dragon…/.

 

D

 

Posted in General, Publishing | Leave a comment

Made Another Sale!

Grantville Gazette bought my story Lex Talionis last night.  It's another Franz and Marla story, and it comes right after 1636: The Devil's Opera in their timeline.  Not short.  (Heh.  I wrote it.  Of course it's not short.)  It came in at a bit over 11,000 words.

I need to issue a tissue warning with this one.  :-)

Not sure when it will be published.  Issue 73 will go up on September 1, and I think they've already got Issue 74 blocked out, so the earliest it could show up would be Issue 75, which will be the January 2018 issue.  But it may even be later than that, depending on what other stories they have in their inventory that need to be published.  We'll just have to wait and see.  Of course, sooner would be better for those of you who follow my work.  :-)

D

Posted in Publishing, Writing | Tagged as: , , | Leave a comment

What’s Happening Soon

Well, after pulling a hat trick in Grantville Gazette Issue 72 a couple of months ago with a story, a serial episode, and an article, I'll only have a serial episode in Issue 73 (albeit 7000 + words). It's almost anticlimactic. But I'll have more stories and articles in future episodes.smiley

 

D

Posted in Publishing, Writing | Leave a comment

More on the Dragon Awards

The link to the full nominations list is here:

http://awards.dragoncon.org/2017-ballot/

The link to the request for a ballot is here:

http://application.dragoncon.org/dc_fan_awards_signup.php.

Go thou and vote!

D

Posted in General | Tagged as: | Leave a comment

2017 Dragon Award Nominations Have Been Announced!

And I have a book on the list!

Under the Best Military Science Fiction category

The Span of Empire, by Eric Flint and David Carrico

Whee!!!

So, now you know who to vote for.

And while you're voting, consider voting for Eric's novel 1636: The Ottoman Onslaught in the Best Alternate History category.

D

Posted in General, Writing | Tagged as: , , , , | Leave a comment

Bit of An Update…

… and all that.

Finished the first draft of an outline for the next Jao novel and sent it to senior author Eric Flint.  We don't have a contract for it yet, so this is all preliminary and "on spec" so to speak, but I believe when the sales figures for The Span of Empire are available for review, Baen will give Eric a contract for a sequel.  And if we have the outline done by then, the writing will commence immediately, which will mean it will be done quicker.  

Have first drafts of a couple of new 1632 stories done, entitled Requiem for the Future and Lex Talionis.   Both of them feature Marla Linder and Franz Sylwester–the first new stories I've written with them as the protagonists in a lot of years.  They will probably land in The Grantville Gazette, but they need some work still, so they haven't been bought yet.

My current new project is a sequel to my story The Quiet Man, which is a non-1632 story that was published in Jim Baen's Universe magazine back in 2007.  The working title is The Wrench in the Monkeyworks.  My goal is that it be a bit of a puzzle story, but also be well-laced with humor.

I'm told that my 1632 book Essen Defiant, a short novel collaboration with Kim Mackey which is a direct sequel to his book Essen Steel, will be published by Eric Flint's Ring of Fire Press in the very near future.  I haven't seen the cover yet.  I'm looking forward to it.

And there are a few things still under development that I can't talk about yet, but I will reveal as soon as I can.

Cheers.

D

Posted in General, Writing | Leave a comment

The State of Reviewing

I know a lot of writers get really worked up about reviews and reviewers, stressing over the quantity and ratings level as if they were a factor in the welfare of the universe.  I've seen some writers go ballistic over a single poor rating, or get in flame wars with reviewers or other writers about ratings.  Myself, I follow Eric Flint's philosophy for the most part.  No writer is going to please every reader with every work.  It just isn't going to happen.  So as long as I'm telling the best story I can tell, and as long as most readers seem to like it, I don't sweat it.  (Of course, if a story gets uniformly poor ratings, that tells me I probably didn't tell a good story.  That's my fault, not the readers'.)

But I will confess that there's one thing I find a bit odd about reviews and reviewers that will occasionally kind of ruffle my feathers.  One of the comments I frequently see in readers' reviews of books goes something like this:

"I really liked the book, but I've read too many of the stories elsewhere, so I'm only going to give it three (or two or one) stars."

People who say things like that really don't seem to understand how story publishing works.  If you're in that category, here's how the traditional model flows:

1.       First cycle:  Stories first get published in venues that promote and accept new short fiction.  Those are usually either magazines or original work anthologies.  Until a few years ago, there were enough magazines in the market that a good writer could generate respectable cash flow from writing stories, because if one editor didn't take a story, the next editor might.  (This is the reality behind Heinlein's Fifth Rule of Writing:  "You must keep [the work] on the market until sold.")  Traditional magazines have been dying out as story venues, but on-line e-magazines keep popping up, and we may well see them fill that writerly ecological niche.

2.       Second cycle:  Historically, story anthologies would occur to either collect the "best" work of a time or place, or to present work that supports a particular theme.  So, you would find "Best SF of 1969", or "Best of Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction 1963", or works like the series of anthologies called "There Will Be War".  Even today, you will find a lot of these types of anthologies.  Until relatively recently, these were the rule and anthologies of original fiction were the exception.

3.       Third cycle:  Once a writer has a sufficient quantity of stories that have been published in various venues, then the writer (or sometimes an agent or publisher) will begin grouping them in collections and publishing them as such.  Sometimes the collections are just sort of ad-hoc collections of stories by that author; sometimes they are thematic collections where the stories gathered together all relate to one another in one way or another.

Here's what a lot of modern readers don't seem to get:  There is nothing new or unusual about this practice.  As long as such a  book is not being marketed as containing all new or all previously unpublished material, it is not deceptive or underhanded to do this.  This has been part of the short story publishing model for generations.  And really, do you expect every single story anthology or collection to always be totally original work?  Every time?

This actually does a service for readers.  If you really like a series of stories that were published in a variety of venues and issues/editions, having them all pulled together into a single volume is a great thing for you when you want to reread the series.  Instead of having to have maybe fifteen or twenty different magazines or anthologies stacked around or loaded on your Kindle—or even worse, having to hunt them down to acquire them—and having to figure out once again what order you have to read them in, you just pick up the collection volume or open up the collection e-book and there they are, nicely together, formatted the same for consistent reading, and in the right order without your having to do anything.  Personally, speaking as a reader, I love it when authors do this.

So be fair….it's okay to comment in a review on the fact that a book contains some (or a lot of) previously published stories, but unless the book is being misleadingly presented as being all new stories, it really isn't fair to lower the rating.  If you thought it was four star good before you realized it wasn't all new material, it should still get a four star rating as long as it's not being misrepresented.

Posted in General, Writing | Tagged as: , , , | Leave a comment

New Work Available

So, recently I wrote a series of stories set in the 1632 universe.  I took a germ of an idea that I had mentioned in 1636: The Devil's Opera, and built a story arc around it.  The idea germ was that a secondary character named Johann Gronow, a real historical personage who was a man of letters, discovered the writings of Edgar Allen Poe and H. P. Lovecraft that came back from the 20th century when Grantville translocated to 17th century Germany, and became so enamored of the idea of horror stories that he started the first horror story magazine in the world in 1634.  (I wanted to name the magazine The Black Cat Magazine, but apparently in German there isn't a generic word for cat, so it got named The Black Tomcat Magazine.)

That's the actual framework in which the story arc is built.  The core of the story arc is that a young man named Philip discovers The Black Tomcat Magazine, is immediately hooked on the horror stories, and very shortly develops a passion to write horror stories.  The story series is entitled Letters from Gronow, and they detail the travails Philip goes through as he tries to learn to write and keeps submitting stories to the magazine.

It's mostly a light-hearted set of stories.  I think you'll enjoy them.

The first story appeared in Grantville Gazette 70, the second just appeared in Grantville Gazette 71, and the remaining four should appear in Grantville Gazettes 72-75 over the next eight months or so.  See the following link.

https://grantvillegazette.com/wp/

D

Posted in Publishing, Writing | Tagged as: , , , , | Leave a comment